portion of banner UH | CTAHR spacer
Biotechnology and Agriculture Education Program - College of Tropical Agriculture and Human Resources - University of Hawaii spacer
UH Seal spacer
UH Seal   spacer
introduction
risks & benefits
label
policy
news & links
biotech in CTAHR
education forum
about us

 

Nature
Published online:
22 March 2005 ;

US launches probe into sales of unapproved transgenic corn
Colin Macilwain


Syngenta admits 150 square kilometres accidentally sown with wrong
seeds.


Some
US corn fields have been sown with a different transgenic strain
to the one that was approved.

A strain of genetically modified corn that does not have regulatory
approval has been distributed by accident over the past four years,
Nature has learned.

Syngenta, one of the world's largest agricultural biotechnology
companies, revealed the mistake to US regulators at the end of last
year. Although the crop is believed to be safe, the fact that it was
sold for years by accident raises serious questions about how carefully
biotechnology firms are controlling their activities, critics say.

The corn (maize) was modified with a gene from the soil bacterium
Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt), which is inserted into the crop to act as
a pesticide. Syngenta has approval to sell a variety of the transgenic
crop called Bt11, which has been used successfully for many years in
the
United States and elsewhere. The strain has been approved for
consumption in the European Union, for example, and may be one of the
first food crops approved for cultivation there.

But between 2001 and 2004, Syngenta inadvertently produced and
distributed several hundred tonnes of Bt10 corn - a different genetic
modification that has not been approved.

Since the release was discovered in late 2004, US government scientists
have assessed the Bt10 corn - which differs from Bt11 by only a handful
of nucleotides on a section of the gene that does not code for the
protein toxin - and have concluded that it is safe to eat and poses no
environmental threat.

"What makes this somewhat unique is that Bt10 and Bt11 are physically
identical and the proteins are identical," says Jeff Stein, head of
regulatory affairs at Syngenta in
Research Triangle Park , North
Carolina
.

Sarah Hull, a spokeswoman for the company in
Washington DC , adds that
Syngenta promptly reported the mistake to regulators after the
discovery. She says this shows that the system is working as it should
do. Company officials also note that the release was relatively small.
About 150 square kilometres of the crop was planted over the four
years, they say, which is 0.01% of all corn planted in the
United
States
during that period. As Bt corn seed has to be bought every year,
rather than being gathered from the previous year's crop, the problem
should not escalate.

Hard to swallow

But Michael Rodemeyer, director of the Pew Initiative on Food and
Biotechnology, a think-tank in
Washington DC , says that the release
reflects the absence of a thorough monitoring system for genetically
modified products in the
US food supply. "This will raise questions in
the minds of countries that import food from the
United States about
whether we have adequate controls in place," Rodemeyer says. "It will
provide ammunition for critics of genetically modified food - and it
may provide incentives for countries to look at non-genetically
modified varieties."

Syngenta discovered the mistake when one of its seed manufacturers,
which was attempting to use the corn seeds in plant-breeding
experiments, informed it that the seed was not Bt11.

Syngenta then told the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the Food
and Drug Administration and the US Department of Agriculture (USDA),
which are jointly responsible for approving genetically modified crops.
Regulators and the company have since been involved in months of
discussions over what should be done about the error, and how and when
information should be released to the public.

White House officials have also been involved in these sensitive talks,
partly because the
United States and the European Union are locked in a
fierce trade dispute over whether tough European rules to trace the
flow of genetically modified crops are scientifically necessary.
Syngenta officials declined to list the countries that accidentally
received the Bt10 seed.
In a statement released to Nature on 14 March, the EPA says that
regulatory agencies are "conducting investigations to determine the
circumstances surrounding and extent of any violations of relevant laws
and regulations". The EPA says that it is investigating whether the
Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act has been breached,
and that the USDA is looking at possible violations of the Plant
Protection Act. "The
US government is also communicating with our major
trading partners to ensure they understand there are no food safety or
environmental concerns," it adds.

The last major, unintended release of a genetically modified crop in
the
United States occurred in 2000, when a Bt corn known as StarLink
was inadvertently planted for human consumption. Because of possible
allergic reactions, StarLink had been approved for use only in animal
feed. Recall of StarLink corn cost the food industry an estimated US$1
billion, according to Rodemeyer, and lent impetus to global concerns
about the safety of genetically modified food.