 |
|
|
Text links below |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Application of Molecular Techniques to Accelerate Genetic Improvement of Taro
|
John Cho, Department of Plant Pathology, University of Hawaii at Manoa,
Honolulu, Hawaii 96822 |
Taro (Colocasia esculenta)
is one of the oldest cultivated crops grown throughout the tropics and subtropics as a
source of carbohydrate. It is thought to have originated in the Indo-Malaysian region,
probably in eastern India and Bangladesh and spread eastward into Southeast Asia, eastern
Asia, and the Pacific Islands. In Hawaii, a number of taro varieties are grown for
specific uses such as table taro, poi, and for the production of taro flour, beverage
powders and other dried products. Consumer demand for taro products is higher than local production, however,
increased production to meet present demand is limited by vulnerability of commercial
varieties to the environment and diseases. Our research focuses on the use of modern
molecular techniques to accelerate breeding for varieties with increased disease
resistance to taro leaf blight caused by a fungus (Phytophthora colocasiae)
and other desirable attributes. As a first step in this process, DNA fingerprints of 42
taro varieties have been made to compare genetic relatedness between taro varieties. The
Figure above shows RAPD patterns produced from DNA amplification of different taro
cultivars illustrating different (polymorphic) banding patterns). Taro
varieties fingerprinted included 23 from Hawaii, 6 from Indonesia, 4 from Papua New
Guinea, 3 from Western Samoa, and 1 each from Japan, New Caledonia, Philippines,
Micronesia, and Thailand. Based on their fingerprints, taro varieties were separated into
5 major related groups. The largest group included 16 of 23 Hawaiian, 3 of 6 Indonesian,
all the Papua New Guinea, Western Samoa, Micronesian, Philippines, and the Polynesian
varieties with close to 80% genetic similarity. The second largest group consisted of
triploid varieties from Japan and New Caledonia and 5 Hawaiian varieties with more than
80% genetic similarity. The next group consisted of 2 Indonesian and 1 Thailand varieties
with more than 75% similarity. Finally, the last 2 groups were composed of only one taro
variety each with one from Hawaii and another from Indonesia. A high level of genetic
variation was observed in the 6 Indonesian taro varieties that ranged from a low of 65%
genetic similarity to a high of 85%. Some of the Hawaiian varieties that are grouped
together based on similar appearance (phenotype) showed more genetic similarity to
Hawaiian varieties outside rather than to members within its group. For example, the
varieties, Piko Kea and Piko Lehua-apei grouped together based upon similar leaf shape,
exhibited only about 85% genetic similarity as compared to a 95% similarity between Piko
Kea and Lehua Palaii. This preliminary study provides a data base for taro breeders to
make informed choices in selection of parents to use in future genetic improvement
programs and provides the foundation to locate regions of the taro DNA linked to
agronomically important genes such as disease resistance to facilitate movement of those
genes into commercial taro varieties.
|
|
|